Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2011 14:53:58 GMT -5
What's the difference between what Herman is being accused of and what Clinton was accused of back during the Paula Jones fiasco?
Does it really matter?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Nov 8, 2011 17:26:45 GMT -5
What's the difference between what Herman is being accused of and what Clinton was accused of back during the Paula Jones fiasco? Oops, 'i' forgot to say it doesn't look like Herman "GOT ANY!" Oops, 'i' forgot to say it doesn't look like Herman "GOT ANY!" Does it really matter? Sorry, 'i' just had to do that to "U"  none @ all "2-me" 'i've been guilty of a {little} horseplay myself... it they can't take it get out of the kitchen...'i' say! if it gets physical that's another subject...but it still depends?    |
|
dent
Full Member
Account Suspended
Posts: 232
|
Post by dent on Nov 12, 2011 20:39:54 GMT -5
What's the difference between what Herman is being accused of and what Clinton was accused of back during the Paula Jones fiasco? Does it really matter? If it was OK for Clinton to do it, then it must be OK for Cain to do it. As I remember it, the main stream media tried their best to ignore the issue and put it out as a "non-event". Odd how now it is such a major crime. And yet there is no proof. No stiff blue dress, or tuna scented cigar as it were. Double standards are just SO obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Nov 13, 2011 8:19:29 GMT -5
|
|
