|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Mar 26, 2014 11:35:54 GMT -5
Is the president such a weak force in his position that his own people know they can take advantage of him {or}
is he actually 'leading-from-behind' by instigating all the scandels that have come-to-force?
Can any or all of the things of questionable nature be contributed to the cartel/mofia* that put him in power?
* The traditional definition is that a Cartel is an organization which is a combination of several independent groups (big business, financial institutions, or other specified political groups, which consolidate to raise campaign funds and limit risks of loosing an election establishing a monopoly (the exclusive possession or control of the government ignoring the voice of the people. While Mofia is a secret political organization operating in several countries and engaged in discrimination against the United States.
"Always Thinking!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Mar 30, 2014 9:13:12 GMT -5
Obama’s Plan : Total Dictatorial Takeover Of America Through Economic Collapse www.resistthetyranny.com/obamas-plan-total-dictatorial-takeover-of-america-through-economic-collapse/Part #1 If Barack Obama gets his way, I wonder if he will demand to be called THE President or King? When you hear people say that Obama is a dictator and he wants to be the supreme ruler of America, do you think it is just rhetoric used by Republicans or do you think there could be some actual substance there? What I have for you, may be the proof needed to back up the horror stories that you hear about him. Let me run over some information for you first - Unemployment When Obama took office, the official unemployment rate was at 5.0%, with the actual rate (“actual “being people not accounted for because they weren’t collecting unemployment from the state), right around 7.0%. Since then, the official unemployment rate is 8.0%, with the actual number being closer to 15.0%. National debt On the first day of Obama’s first term, the debt was $10.626 trillion. That is what Obama and his supporters say was “the mess that the previous administration left” for Obama. Today, through constant borrowing and overspending, the national debt is $16.9 trillion and rising at the alarming rate of about $12,000 per second. www.usdebtclock.org/How is that for what the Obama administration calls “economic recovery.” Obamacare With literally thousands of jobs already lost because of the disastrous economic effects of Obamacare, expert economists say that millions more will be lost when the hilariously titled “Affordable Care Act” goes in to full effect in 2014. To top off the job losses, many employees who are lucky enough to still have a job, have been cut to part time in order for businesses to stay afloat. We are not talking about huge multi-billion dollar corporations, no, we are talking “mom and pop,” small middle class businesses. Overspending and printing money At the tune of $85 billion per month of U.S. currency being printed without any backing, QE3 is fast becoming one of the biggest reasons that the U.S. dollar’s spending power has dropped to nearly nothing. With the United States global credit rating dropping in 2011 from a AAA to a AA+, dropping further in 2012 to AA and now at AA-, one would think that Obama would try a different approach to economics if he was honestly trying to fix the economy. We all know that “honesty” is not Obama’s strong suite though. We have also witnessed the massive overspending that this administration seems to have a problem with. Right now, the federal government spends approximately $12.00 for every $7.00 of revenue, with those numbers rapidly getting spread wider apart. What does all of this have to do with Obama implementing dictatorial powers? I present Executive Order 11051. This order specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis. |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Mar 30, 2014 9:18:16 GMT -5
Part #2
What does “all Executive Orders” in EO11051 mean?
Here is a list of EO’s that give total power over every aspect of our lives to the President or whomever he chooses.
* Executive Order 10990 allows the Government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
* Executive Order 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
* Executive Order 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
* Executive Order 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
* Executive Order 11001 allows the government to take over all health education and welfare functions.
* Executive Order 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
* Executive Order 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
* Executive Order 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish new locations for populations.
* Executive Order 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways, and public storage facilities.
Not only do those orders allow complete control over every aspect of our lives, EO 11000 and 11004 allow the government to forcefully relocate Americans to internment camps and put us in forced labor. EO 11002 allows national registration of all people!
Sounds kind of like what the Nazis did, doesn’t it?
As you can see, if Obama wrecks the economy bad enough, he can implement Executive Order 11051, under the “economic or financial crisis” section. This would then allow him to enact all the EO’s that I have listed, hence, complete dictatorial power over the United States.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 5, 2014 6:03:33 GMT -5
If he is tried for treason for his representation of Muslims, the FBI, CIA and much of the rest of the government is implicated as well. After all, the FBI had the intercepts and did nothing. Further, impeachment for treason raises all sorts of fundamental questions about the nature of the American Empire that our alien elites would just as soon avoid. Such a prosecution would squarely pose what National Review calls "the national question." After all, our ruling elites have a very tough time understanding why exactly Euro-Americans in the "fly-over" zones of the U.S. should have any superior claim on their loyalty than Chinese or Israelis. National borders have ceased to have any meaning to these elites precisely because the American Nation has no meaning to them ! Impeaching a President for representing a foreign power would affront our elites. They are themselves aliens and are not about to allow an artificial construct like national borders interfere with their agenda of looting the American majority by putting in office puppets that look and talk like that majority. What difference could it make whether the financing of a particular puppet comes from Beijing or Scarsdale? www.stormfront.org/0198/clinton_bimbo_eruption.htmSo many of the tings in this article apply to Obama as well, it brings forth a feeling of deja voo in reverse. |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 9, 2014 11:08:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 10, 2014 9:24:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 10, 2014 13:45:34 GMT -5
Did you see the thread where I tied Obama, Holder, an Sharpton together
in sharpton's "black caucus"?
Rev. Al Sharpton, president of the National Action Network
Go to the 5th pic for the video of Holder as NAN.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 10, 2014 15:13:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 11, 2014 16:45:56 GMT -5
Former ACORN CEO at Sharpton Convention: Amnesty Opponents, Voter ID Supporters Want USA Apartheid www.breitbart.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on Apr 12, 2014 12:49:29 GMT -5
American Thinker
April 12, 2014
Witness to Sharpton drug deal: 'It was greed. He just wanted money'
Thomas Lifson
Al Sharpton, whose organization just hosted President Obama and Eric Holder, was forced into becoming an FBI informant because the feds had him cold in a drug deal for cocaine, according to a former pal of his. Frank Rosario of the New York Post reports:
A drug trafficker who worked for Al Sharpton’s nonprofit in the 1980s said that despite the preacher’s denials, he was eager to get a slice of the lucrative drug deal captured on FBI surveillance video.
“It was greed. He just wanted money,” Robert Curington, 72, told The Post during a two-day interview at his North Carolina home, detailing for the first time how Sharpton stepped into the FBI’s trap — and was then forced to become a federal informant.
Sharpton has said he showed interest in the drug deal only because he feared the undercover agent was armed. He also claimed that he snitched for the feds — as first reported by The Smoking Gun this week — because the mob was threatening him.
Curington called all of that a tall tale.
For the moment, this is a he said/he said story. But the FBI has files that could reveal much.
Meanwhile, the POTUS and the nation’s top law enforcement officer who supervises the FBI saw fit to grace the podium of Sharpton’s organization this week, a matter which should be of deep shame to them and the nation. Sharpton has already distinguished himself as a race-baiter who incited the death of several people at Freddy’s Fashion Mart in Harlem, which he denounced as “outside interlopers” for the crime of being not black operators of a store in a predominantly black neighborhood.
The fact that Sharpton, who weaseled out of paying a court judgment against him for libel in the shameful Tawana Brawley hoax by claiming, among other outrageous falsehoods, that he did not own the expensive suits he wore, is not held up as a pariah is a mark of shame for Obama, Holder, and MSNBC among many others.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 15, 2014 6:55:00 GMT -5
May 15, 2014 The Intolerant Hypocrisy of America's 'Tolerant' President By Jeannie DeAngelis Thanks to Barack Obama’s inability to remain out of the sexual-political arena, once again the depths of liberal hypocrisy are revealed for all to see. It began when openly gay award-winning Missouri defensive end Michael Sam was named St. Louis Ram’s 249th overall choice in the 2014 NFL draft. Sam, the man with the two first names, felt compelled to publicly celebrate with his boyfriend Vito Cammisano. In a video tight shot, surrounded by adoring family and friends, Mike and Vito recreated the customary wedding cake routine where the bride and groom stuff whipped cream into one another’s mouths and then partake of a messy, gooey lip lock. Clearly thrilled beyond belief, via a White House statement, Barack Obama congratulated Michael Sam, the Rams, and the NFL for “taking an important step forward in our Nation's journey.” After all, knowing Sam’s sexual preference is sure to have a huge impact on next year’s football season. In what can only be described as a cheap paraphrase of Martin Luther King’s "not color of skin, but content of character" statement, Obama’s gay-football kudos included the following: “From the playing field to the corporate boardroom, LGBT Americans prove everyday [sic] that you should be judged by what you do and not who you are.” Here’s the problem with that heartwarming sentiment: just days prior to Obama’s message to Michael, real-estate expert David Benham and his twin brother Jason’s fixer-upper show Flip it Forward, which was due to premier in October, was canceled by Home and Garden TV because a left-wing activist group exposed the brothers, calling them “anti-gay extremists.” Right Wing Watch found out that in their private lives, the brothers support the pro-life movement and promote marriage. In addition, it was also revealed that David dared to express the opinion that the radical religion of Boko Haram, the group who kidnapped approximately 300 schoolgirls in Nigeria, “takes life and enslaves it,” which, although true, isn’t something Islam-loving liberals are ever going to acknowledge. Unlike Michael Sam, who is encouraged to be who he is, what the Benhams “do,” which is to “find a fixer-upper and transform it into the dream home [needy families] never thought they could afford,” has very publicly now taken a backseat to who they “are.” The reason why is because lately, in Barack Obama’s "fundamentally transformed" America, the sin of being a Christian family man and churchgoing son of a pastor is grounds for national shaming. Yet Sam’s demonstrative show of celebratory affection for Cammisano, something that is poles apart from pro-life advocacy or signing a petition in support of marriage, is nonetheless just as private a display, if not more so, as protesting abortion or speaking out against gay rights – two things the telegenic twins are currently being chastised for. So what’s the problem? If Obama’s laudatory statement to Sam is true and equality is the goal, then why do we have three men, all of whom have different skill sets and abilities, being treated so differently? The one who is gay is being judged for "what he does," while the other two, perceived as homophobic, are consequently judged and condemned for "who they are." It’s clear Michael Sam is a man of strong persuasion and, like the Benhams, is proud to show it, which is his right. The difference is that the North Carolina-based brothers proclaim their faith in God and disapprove of lifestyles and practices they personally feel go against biblical tenets, which used to also be their right as Americans. However, for the Benhams, vocal expression of personal beliefs has resulted in hypocrites like Barack Obama, self-proclaimed champion of diverse lifestyles, proving yet again that he is anything but. It makes one wonder what exactly the president is talking about when he lauds Michael Sam, the Rams, and the NFL for “taking an important step forward in our Nation’s journey.” Where exactly are those steps taking America? And as far as this “Nation’s journey,” what’s the destination if a culture that claims inclusiveness excludes, punishes, and demonizes 83% percent of Americans who call themselves Christian, 37% of whom, like the Benhams, identify themselves as evangelical? Chris Stone, founder of Faith Driven Consumer, called HGTV canceling Flip it Forward a “rash action.” After all, Barack Obama did say that “from the playing field to the board room,” intolerance "holds no place" in what Stone defines as “America’s rainbow of diversity.” Isn’t that right, President Obama? Seeing as how Barack didn’t also issue a public statement in the Benhams’ defense, it’s likely the president differs with this premise from Mr. Stone: Whether people agree or disagree with the Benhams' faith-driven perspective is beside the point; the Benhams have a right to have those views and to be treated equally with those who hold to other viewpoints. This is the very definition of tolerance. Not anymore! After participating in a shared exhibition of same-sex affection, which has now been juxtaposed with some of the things the Benham brothers oppose, Michael Sam is being celebrated as a trailblazer by a president who picks and chooses where he applies the unbiased tolerance he’s always talking about. Nonetheless, the Benhams have said that they have not, and would never, “discriminate against people who do not share [their] views.” Yet all that matters little, because it’s the Benhams who are the ones being discriminated against. Meanwhile, Barack Obama, who prides himself on standing up for social justice and fostering fairness, hasn’t said one word about the injustice of punishing two men based on who they are, and what they believe, rather than what they do. That’s why America should sit up and take notice. Once again, thanks to Barack Obama, liberal hypocrisy and all of its intolerant splendor is on display for the whole world to see www.americanthinker.com/2014/05/the_intolerant_hypocrisy_of_americas_tolerant_president.html |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 15, 2014 7:11:06 GMT -5
May 15, 2014 The Intolerant Hypocrisy of America's 'Tolerant' President By Jeannie DeAngelis Thanks to Barack Obama’s inability to remain out of the sexual-political arena, once again the depths of liberal hypocrisy are revealed for all to see. It began when openly gay award-winning Missouri defensive end Michael Sam was named St. Louis Ram’s 249th overall choice in the 2014 NFL draft. Sam, the man with the two first names, felt compelled to publicly celebrate with his boyfriend Vito Cammisano. In a video tight shot, surrounded by adoring family and friends, Mike and Vito recreated the customary wedding cake routine where the bride and groom stuff whipped cream into one another’s mouths and then partake of a messy, gooey lip lock. Clearly thrilled beyond belief, via a White House statement, Barack Obama congratulated Michael Sam, the Rams, and the NFL for “taking an important step forward in our Nation's journey.” After all, knowing Sam’s sexual preference is sure to have a huge impact on next year’s football season. Obama’s gay-football kudos included the following: “From the playing field to the corporate boardroom, LGBT Americans prove everyday [sic] that you should be judged by what you do and not who you are.” Here’s the problem with that heartwarming sentiment: just days prior to Obama’s message to Michael, real-estate expert David Benham and his twin brother Jason’s fixer-upper show Flip it Forward, which was due to premier in October, was canceled by Home and Garden TV because a -left-wing activist group- exposed the brothers, calling them “anti-gay extremists.” Right Wing Watch found out that in their private lives, the brothers support the pro-life movement and promote marriage. In addition, it was also revealed that David dared to express the opinion that the radical religion of Boko Haram, the group who kidnapped approximately 300 schoolgirls in Nigeria, “takes life and enslaves it,” which, although true, isn’t something Islam-loving liberals are ever going to acknowledge. Unlike Michael Sam, who is encouraged to be who he is, what the Benhams “do,” which is to “find a fixer-upper and transform it into the dream home [needy families] never thought they could afford,” has very publicly now taken a backseat to who they “are.” The reason why is because lately, in Barack Obama’s "fundamentally transformed" America, the sin of being a Christian family man and churchgoing son of a pastor is grounds for national shaming. The North Carolina-based brothers proclaim their faith in God and disapprove of lifestyles and practices they personally feel go against biblical tenets, which used to also be their right as Americans. However, for the Benhams, vocal expression of personal beliefs has resulted in hypocrites like Barack Obama, self-proclaimed champion of diverse lifestyles, proving yet again that he is anything but. It makes one wonder what exactly the president is talking about when he lauds Michael Sam, the Rams, and the NFL for “taking an important step forward in our Nation’s journey.” Where exactly are those steps taking America? And as far as this “Nation’s journey,” what’s the destination if a culture that claims inclusiveness excludes, punishes, and demonizes 83% percent of Americans who call themselves Christian, 37% of whom, like the Benhams, identify themselves as evangelical? Barack Obama did say that “from the playing field to the board room,” intolerance "holds no place" in “America’s rainbow of diversity.” Isn’t that right, President Obama? Seeing as how Barack didn’t also issue a public statement in the Benhams’ defense, it’s likely the president differs with their premise. Whether people agree or disagree with the Benhams' faith-driven perspective is beside the point; the Benhams have a right to have those views and to be treated equally with those who hold to other viewpoints. This is the very definition of tolerance. A president who picks and chooses where he applies the unbiased tolerance he’s always talking about. The Benhams have said that they have not, and would never, “discriminate against people who do not share [their] views.” Barack Obama, who prides himself on standing up for social justice and fostering fairness, hasn’t said one word about the injustice of punishing two men based on who they are, and what they believe, rather than what they do. That’s why America should sit up and take notice. Once again, thanks to Barack Obama, liberal hypocrisy and all of its intolerant splendor is on display for the whole world to see www.americanthinker.com/2014/05/the_intolerant_hypocrisy_of_americas_tolerant_president.html |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 18, 2014 8:16:29 GMT -5
www.libertynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Picture-1.png Caption This (And Please Keep It Clean, As Tempting As It Might Be to Do Otherwise) Irresistible. To share this “official White House photo” is simply irresistible. And to ask for your creative contribution to the photographic history of Barack Obama, also irresistible. To think that Team Obama believes this is appropriate or flattering or dignifying…or something. Believe it or not, this photo is the real deal – not a fake, not posted by some hoax news site, not a photoshopped joke, but…well, read the actual caption from the whitehouse.gov website: President Barack Obama slides across a counter to pose for photos with staff following lunch at the Dupont Circle Shake Shack in Washington, D.C., May 16, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza) Now, have fun with your own caption, and please keep it clean and try to be at least somewhat more respectful to the office of the presidency than the current occupant of the White House seems to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 20, 2014 9:52:52 GMT -5
Commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces Perhaps no other president defined presidential wartime powers like Abraham Lincoln did. In 1861, while Congress was adjourned, he activated the military, sent troops to Southern states, ordered the Navy to blockade the port of New Orleans and appropriated funds from the Treasury. Lincoln was also the first to declare martial law (the temporary removal of power from the courts) and suspend habeas corpus (the right for a prisoner to petition the legality of his or her imprisonment). I do see the resemblance as Obama has stated. How much respect has Obama lost over the VA Scandal incident. In the event Obama declares martial law will the Armed Forces be willing to shot other Americans or does Obama have his own private army to defend against public protestors? Maybe some of the 'conspiracy's' aren't conspiracy. Him and now almost all his administration or under-fire for one reason or another...the rest to be soon(?) Urban Dictionary definition of conspiracy: www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=conspiracy |
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 23, 2014 15:52:42 GMT -5
"The {Green Lantern} Theory" Presidents consistently overpromise and underdeliver. What they need to say to get elected far outpaces what they can actually do in office. President Obama is a perfect example. His 2008 campaign didn't just promise health-care reform, a stimulus bill, and financial regulation. It also promised a cap-and-trade bill to limit carbon emissions, comprehensive immigration reform, gun control, and much more. His presidency, he said, would be change American could believe in. But it's clear now that much of the change he promised isn't going to happen — in large part because he doesn't have the power to make it happen. www.vox.com/2014/5/20/5732208/the-green-lantern-theory-of-the-presidency-explainedPS: You'll love this one! |
|
