Bergdahl

[Hoosier Hillbilly]

This is all a big lie and the Taliban never intended to kill him over a leak. It simply makes no sense to believe the Taliban would have cared much if anyone leaked. For one thing, the prospect of a Bergdahl/Taliban swap has been reported in papers like the NYT for at least two years. The Taliban themselves chattered about it to the AP last year. Plus, if you think about it, having the deal leak in advance would only enhance the propaganda victory for them. If news of an impending swap had broken a week earlier, American media had erupted over it, and then a [[battered Obama had bowed to the Taliban and done the deal anyway, it would have been a supreme humiliation.]] (( The POTUS suffering from "NPD" would avoid this at all costs - as is evident)) The only reason to think the Taliban was skittish about leaks was because they were afraid that news breaking in advance would cow Obama (( Syria ))((Benghazi)) (( VA scandal)) (( IRS )) ((NSA)) ((Immigration)) [[just to name a few]] into scuttling the deal — but in that case, with Obama’s course of action uncertain, why would they have gone ahead and killed Bergdahl before O had made a final decision? It may be that they told the White House that they’d kill BB if Obama backed out at the last minute, but that’s not the same as saying they’d kill him if it leaked. And it’s certainly no justification for O to withhold notice from Congress.


Pay particular attention to the 'unanimous decision among my principals ((which are who )){George Soros?} and "My Government"
hotair.com/archives/2014/06/07/obama-on-bergdahl-a-unanimous-decision-among-my-principals-in-my-government/