|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 14, 2016 6:53:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 14, 2016 14:43:22 GMT -5
I have a philosophical* question for you > * relating or devoted to the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence
Does times change people or does people change times more?
Nothing happens in isolation. If there is a change that has happened anywhere, it is because of a force that has acted to make the change possible. Time, in itself means nothing whatsoever. People change with time because of the different experiences they have had as time moves. They meet new people, experience new feelings, come across new events and all this helps people think in a different way than before.
So you cannot say that time by itself has changed anything. Time is only the progressive movement of the Earth around the sun, or it spinning on its axis to cause day and night. However, it leads to a change in the environment and to progressive ageing in people but which cause people to experience different things in life, which in turn changes them every year, every week, every day and every moment.
Which would indicate that it's US that has made the world what it is and what we've done right or wrong during the years for it's development to be where it is now. Isn't it time we reflect on the past to figure out what the future will bring? 'What goes around comes around' - this statement is irrefutable. And taking it as our basic analogy 'we' must refute ant other possibility of accidental terminology.
Leaving US with only reasoning, logic, and common sense to determine our future existence and who will lead US in this venture of 'time' vs humanity. So do "WE" depend on popular vote or make our decision on those we have selected to lead US? "WE" put them there to do exactly that, now are we defying their ability to do so? Do you actually think the majority of the populous (voters) have the intelligence needed to select our next president after the last 8 years we've been through?
This is not something to take lightly, "WE" are @ a major turning point in the history of this nation from freedom and democracy to oppression and total dependence on government, what is your choice? If your uncertain of your decision I suggest you review the comments of our founders and take their advice into serious concern.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 14, 2016 16:25:28 GMT -5
Inurgent - a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, especially a person who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; rebel.
Muslim entry into the United States > no more until ISIS is defeated!
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 15, 2016 7:54:29 GMT -5
It is a person that exaggerates their self importance. These people like to boast or brag about their achievements, positions and accomplishments. Often seen as drama queens, blowhards and egomaniacs. These people like to inflate their credentials, but in reality they're not that important. The people who like to inflate their claim to fame are a legend in one's own mind.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 16, 2016 15:45:03 GMT -5
Two (2) political conventions coming up each to decide who'll they run for president of The United States: www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2016-party-conventions/2016-republican-party-convention/www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2016-party-conventions/2016-democratic-party-convention/What "WE" see is a reflection of what this nation has become to be > why, how, when, where, and what at this point is beside the point (it is what it is), a divided nation of unprincipled participants indulging discussions and delusions of nothing to do with what the founding fathers had in mind for a successful democracy (republic) that people could prosper in and hope and pray to gain accomplishment in. Now the fear of not being able better the standards of life has driven people to the brink of insanity and it's very evident. People just want to be left alone and work for the betterment of their families and have a chance, government has intervened @ so many points this is no longer possible. Wouldn't a revolt (revolution) be your main course of restitution? Of course it would and that's what you'll see in both conventions, it's not going to be peaceful or nice and no-one can determine what will come out on the other side but it will be more than "interesting"! PS: 'i'm still for Cruz!
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 16, 2016 17:06:50 GMT -5
The people of this nation are not intelligent enough to solve the problems }therefore{ the government certainly isn't so what's the solution > > a dictatorship > > NWO. Want it or not it's our >new course<! Which means "WE" gave up the best for the worse! Now "WE" become like other 3rd world countries just working to stay alive *=* is it worth it? *=*
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 17, 2016 9:12:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 17, 2016 15:00:02 GMT -5
I want Barack Obama, John Kerry, Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Josh Earnest, Lois Lerner, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch all to be indicted for their indiscrepancies by a jury of 12 people in a federal court and charges to be brought against them. *Including denying all government benefits in the future. Then I'll be happy.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 18, 2016 7:09:47 GMT -5
After hearing all the pros & cons it's my best decision we determine who the majority is and render a decision from that survey. "WE" have the perverts and pedophiles on one side and the Transgender on the other ()LGBT() ? Should either or neither be discriminated against ? [ both have the same rights ] (and both or illegal in my mind-one group by God's laws. But that's MPO>
Were told that transgenders represent .03% of out population What "WE" haven't discussed is the following: Child molestation and pedophilia occur far more commonly among homosexuals than among heterosexuals on a per capita basis, according to a new study.
“Overwhelming evidence supports the belief that homosexuality is a sexual deviancy often accompanied by disorders that have dire consequences for our culture.
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 19, 2016 7:10:21 GMT -5
Hillary is avoiding the national media, WHY??? Hillary Clinton is running an anything-but-open campaign when it comes to the media. The presidential hopeful that once used a rope to hold reporters back does not take questions from the traveling press and shuns the cable news networks. She's been asked by all the news commentators on FOX and refused to comply to their requests to be on their show, WHY??? ( And why hasn't FOX made more out of it??? ) The last article GOOGLE printed on this question was February 16, 2016, WHY??? www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/05/18/you-wont-believe-hillary-clintons-spin-on-avoiding-the-press/
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 19, 2016 14:49:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 19, 2016 15:06:23 GMT -5
I just read an article on Yahoo about Trey Gowdy by Charles P. Pierce,Esquire. This man should have his nuts cut out and hung on a pole. Anyone that would misrepresent the purpose and effort Trey has endeavored to use for the parents of the Benghazi attack and prove Hillary & Obama's guilt in this venture as an actual act of treason needs investigated themselves. IMHO!!!
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 20, 2016 9:59:02 GMT -5
Why are so many people rallying around Trump?
"WE" are totally feed-up with all of governments "BULLSHIT!!!" And Trump is the only way "WE" have to defend our-self since our legislature will do nothing about it. "WE" keep being distracted by 'trivial' issues =while= TSA spends millions on unnecessary expenditures. Multi-millions on airfare for Obama & crew Feeding, housing,and assistance for illegal immigrants & refugees
Convention of the States Our only other alternative* *http://www.conventionofstates.com/
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 20, 2016 15:31:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hoosier Hillbilly on May 24, 2016 9:11:22 GMT -5
|
|